Questions specific to Brown, including our essays for the application cycle, are found in the section labeled "Questions." If you are applying to the eight-year Program in Liberal Medical Education (PLME) or the five-year Brown-Rhode Island School of Design Dual Degree Program (BRDD), you must also complete the special program essays Choose the essay topic that appeals to you most. The topic is less important than your delivery Remember: there is no right or wrong answer. The college just wants to know who you are and how your mind works. Bad essay topics - there are bad essays, not bad topics; but be careful about the following: • Winning or losing the big game Aug 16, · To revisit a metaphor I used in that post, style is the wrapping paper of your essay–the content is the gift. As much as we love a pretty package, we want to open it up to find something wonderful inside. Students frequently ask what they should write about–there is really no way for an admission counselor to answer this question
Achiever Essays - Your favorite homework help service
How to answer law questions: Over the years, law schools and law universities have evolved two methods of asking test or exam questions. They are the problem and essay questions patterns. Basically, these two ways of asking questions require a totally different ways of answering them that are different from the traditional ways of answering questions in the primary, secondary, and tertiary institutions.
One major problem that new law university intakes encounter, is the fact that many of them usually have the mindset that where they are university will be the same with where they are coming from secondary school ; and because of this, they tend not to ask questions about how well to answer their law questions thus going on to use the traditional or general method and ending up not getting the expected result or even failing. In this article, I am going to be expounding on the way of tackling law essay questions for the how to answer specific question in an admission essay of students, how to answer specific question in an admission essay.
However, what I will be discussing is the general rule which is subject to what your specific tutor or lecturer may require from you, how to answer specific question in an admission essay. Differences between cross-offers and counter-offers. Mojekwu v Mojekwu: Facts, how to answer specific question in an admission essay, Issues and Decision of the court. As you may know, Law problem questions are not the same as essay questions.
Problem questions are those law questions that tell live stories about the relationship between people and then require you to identify legal issues from those interactions, address the issues with relevant authorities and then to advise the parties on their different rights using the IRAC method. It is important to note that a single problem question could have a series of different events which are based on different legal principles.
On the other hand, an essay question is a question which requires an individual to write on legal principles without using a particular format like the IRAC method. Notminding the fact that you are not required to advise the parties or to use a particular method to answer your question, you have to have some mental steps at the back of your mind so as to make your work enticing and arranged before your tutor or Lecturer.
Here, law students will be how to answer specific question in an admission essay to draw out the issues of law in the story, how to answer specific question in an admission essay, as it relates to what they have been taught in the classroom.
Take for instance, a problem question on customary law might tell the story of a man who beats his wife because the custom provides for it. After explaining the story, students will be required to either provide the position of the law on the issues raised in the story or to advise the parties in the story. The most acceptable way of answering law problem questions is through IRAC method. IRAC is actually the best because it makes it very easy for students to explain any legal principle with authorities in the simplest format.
Below are the things you must know about IRAC method of answering law questions. Note that if you must answer problem questions using this format, you must have this acronym at the back of your mind. If you miss any step, then you are getting the whole question wrong, how to answer specific question in an admission essay. Now, to make sure that you understand the steps listed above, i will take my time to explain what you are supposed to do in every step. Remember, this is to teach you how to answer law problem question using IRAC method.
Your first concern is to determine the issue or issues implicated in the question. This determination involves asking yourself, what is the problem sought to be addressed in the case? Example: What is the liability of a master regarding tort committed by his servant while engaged in a conduct expressly prohibited by the master? The importance of accurate identification of the issue s is that it narrows your response to the gist of the question.
Your task is to focus only on those elements or information that substantively not tangentially speak to the issue s you have successfully identified. Relevance is the key here. Note that you are not expected to call the names of parties in the story in the issues because they are issues for determination in law. Also read: Are lawyers liars? The truth as to whether lawyers are liars. As you think through the problems presented, aided by the issue you have successfully identified, how to answer specific question in an admission essay, the rule will emerge.
What rule of law will guide the court in reaching a correct decision, assuming the same facts? This is the question that you need to ask your self; it is also the question that you need to address. Under the rule of law, students are expected to cite their authorities.
Authorities here can be cases, statutes, dictum of judges, articles which are related to the issue in question. It is very important that you cite authorities because that is what will back up the rule of law and legal principles in the case. This is where you apply the rule of law to the issue s you have raised. By doing this, you are applying the rule of law to the actual story in the problem question given to you.
In the application, you are expected to pick those authorities and rules of law that concerns the issues raised and apply them to the matter effectively. By constantly reminding yourself of the issue syou are bound to succeed in steering yourself away from irrelevance. A few sentences would suffice to wrap up your discussion. Briefly state the outcome of your analysis. Where the question requires that you advise the parties, the conclusion is the best place to do that.
Simply tell each of the parties their rights and persuade them to sue the when the need be. Now that you know what all the letters in the acronym IRAC entails, I will give you an example of how a perfect law problem question is answered. The example below is a problem question that borders on the law of defamation. Just keep reading. You will still be able to understand the steps taken in every section. Also read: List of less competitive universities in Nigeria Barrister Akuepue and Barrister Ikpeama, another popular lawyer based in Enugu have sepaprately sued Joe, the edito of The Daily Trumpeter and Ade for publication.
Issue 3: What is the legal position on defamation of a class or a group of person. Defamation refers to the publication of a statement which is calculated to injure a person and cause right-thinking members of the society to shun or avoid him, or even cause them to hate him and also convey an imputation on him which is injurious to his office, trade or profession — s.
People are thus warned against idle gossip which may likely impugn another person when communicated to a third party. Defamation may either be in the form of libel which is in a permanent form such as newspaper publication, television or radio broadcasts; or otherwise in slander which has a transient nature usually verbalized or through gesticulations conveying a defamatory connotation.
For an action in defamation to succeed, the following essential elements must be proved, as a thing of necessity:. If right-thinking people of sane minds would think less of an individual or shun and avoid him due to a statement, then this element may be said to have been successfully proved.
It is not sufficient that the defamatory statement described a person merely by his name Akintla v. It is enough where how to answer specific question in an admission essay is identified by his initials, post, Photograph, or even his office — Dafe v. It has been held in a vast litany of cases that it is not the publication of defamatory statement but the publication that grounds a cause of action. In fact, in Pullman v.
However, even if a person has been alleged to have defamed another, there is an array of defenses open to him.
Such defenses are:. Under the defenses of privilegewe have what is known as absolute privileges and also qualified privileges. Circumstances under which the defense of qualified privilege can arise are varied but for the purposes of our case, we have an occasion known as Statements made in performance of a legal, moral or social duty — s.
In the connection above, for such an occasion to arise, the person giving out information which is alleged to contain defamatory statements must have a duty to give such information on grounds of public policy and also the party receiving such information, that is, the person to whom the matter is published to must have a corresponding duty of receiving such information.
Perhaps, this is the reason the law admits that radio and television broadcasters as well as Newspaper Publishers and Proprietors are covered by the said defense — NTA v. It is also the legal position, pursuant to s. However, such broadcasters or publishers must be very careful enough to give reports of what actually took place in court, not necessarily a verbatim report of the proceedings but at least an abridged or condensed report will be privileged, provided that it gives a fair, accurate and correct impression of what transpired.
Also read: Names of Nigerian Presidents From till Date Full list. It clearly and necessarily follows that when such reports are substantially inaccurate, such a report will lose the protective cloak of this defense.
However, those words were never used by the Judge, and the courts held that such a newspaper report had lost the defense of qualified privilege. The defense of fair comment stated above, consists of criticisms of matters of public interest in the form of comments, by citizens upon true facts, such comments being honestly made without malice — s.
In order for this defense to avail a person, the following requirements must be proved to the satisfaction of the courts trying the issue:. The matter must be one of general concern as to affect the generality of the population at large- London Artists Ltd. Thus issues of land fraud by legal practitioners may fall for issues of public interest. The distinction between a comment and a fact, however, depends on the merits of each case. The Comment must be Honest- s. However, criticisms cannot be used as a cloak for an attack, or for personal imputations on the plaintiff not arising out of the subject matter not based how to answer specific question in an admission essay the facts.
The Comment must be devoid of Malice- s. Malice means making abuse of the occasion for some indirect purpose — Bakare v. When a class or group of persons i. lawyers, teachers, doctors etc, are defamed, no individual member of the class is entitled to bring action upon grounds that he has been defamed save only when the class is so small or so ascertainable that what is said of the class is necessarily said of each and every member of it, or if the circumstances of the case show that the plaintiff was singled out and defamed — Knuppfer v.
London Express Newspaper Ltd. Thus, in Zik Enterprises ltd. Awolowoan article which contained defamatory statements against the Action Group was regarded by the court not to refer to the plaintiff but to the Action Group as a political party since it was a large group and the plaintiff could not show circumstances which proved that he was singled out. Also read: How to answer Law problem questions effectively. It seems that Daily Trumpeter will not escape liability if the report they gave of the how to answer specific question in an admission essay proceedings was grossly inaccurate or did not give a correct impression of what actually transpired therein.
Also, Ade seems to have overstepped the boundaries of fair comment by making such a comment, he seems to have made a statement of fact because saying that someone is in the habit of doing something is as much as imputing a disreputable motive upon him which is very much actionable in law.
Hence the cloak of fair comment how to answer specific question in an admission essay no longer protect. Barrister Akuepue and Barrister Ikpeama by bringing action against Ade seem to be oblivious of the applicable guiding principles in the circumstance. In this connection, a defamatory statement against Nigerian lawyers as a whole is too large a group for the purposes of an action in defamation, unless, if they can show that they were singled out and defamed, how to answer specific question in an admission essay.
They may be going on a wild goose chase. Joe : You will only escape liability if what you said happened in court was accurate, otherwise, you will fall for liability. Ade: It is true you have overstepped the bounds of fair comment; however you may still escape liability under the principles of defamation of a class or group. Barrister Akuepue and Barrister Ikpeama : You both can only bring action against Ade and Joe should what Joe reported about the proceedings be inaccurate.
With respect to Ade although he has lost the defense of fair comment, he can still be liable for publishing what Joe reported, only the will you have a cause of action against him.
Must read: Most populated universities in Nigeria
5 Rules for Answering ESSAY Questions on Exams
, time: 9:35Assignment Essays - Best Custom Writing Services
For each of these prompts, make sure you answer all parts of the question, relate the topic to yourself, and follow the guidelines listed above. Fundamental Tips for the Common App Essays While different schools may put varying levels of emphasis on the essay, it is How to answer law questions: Over the years, law schools and law universities have evolved two methods of asking test or exam questions. They are the problem and essay questions patterns. Basically, these two ways of asking questions require a totally different ways of answering them that are different from the traditional ways of answering questions in the primary, secondary, and tertiary Questions specific to Brown, including our essays for the application cycle, are found in the section labeled "Questions." If you are applying to the eight-year Program in Liberal Medical Education (PLME) or the five-year Brown-Rhode Island School of Design Dual Degree Program (BRDD), you must also complete the special program essays
No comments:
Post a Comment